Wednesday, September 29, 2010
Nothing Says Love Like a Bullet in the Brain
Yep, I can dig the genre with fare such as Nick Nolte and Eddie Murphy in 48 Hours, the Diehard franchise, Turner and Hooch, Penn & Duvall in Colors, or in the television series The Wire with McNulty and Bunk among other paired characters on The Job. The buddy cop dynamic can be great fun. In the case of From Paris with Love, audiences are shafted with an exercise in misogyny. Jonathan Rhys Meyers plays James Reece, the straight guy in the pairing with Travolta’s renegade Charlie Wax. Reece lives with a fashion designer Caroline (Kasia Smutniak). All he seems to want from her is dinner on the table and hot sex, the usual feed-and-fuck mainstay of the demands upon women in hetero relationships. When it turns out that she may not be who she seems, Reece blubbers that he doesn’t know any of her friends and family or anything about her life. How could he have missed glaring evidence of her guilt, he whinges.
The idea that he’s living with a stranger, someone he doesn’t know, fails to be of pressing concern until her culpability in terrorism becomes apparent. This sentiment was echoed not long ago on an episode of Mad Men when Don Draper was asked what women wanted, to which he issued the terse ‘who cares?’ in response. The assumption for guys choked with gendered entitlement is that women are not worth knowing. Don’t trouble a dude with the messy business of relationship maintenance, learning the narrative of a partner’s life, hopes for the future, worries or social network. Like many guys, Reece’s operating from his privilege not to be inconvenienced by a woman. Women should be accommodating and fuckable and then quiet about their own life and needs. Caroline fails to claim her own agenda even in her rogue politics. She’s doing it to please a thug. Not only does the plot devolve to the inevitable scene where he has to ice the bitch, but Reece delivers the bullet between her eyes after a rambling speech about how all that matters is that he loves her. Nothing says love like a clean head shot, afterall.
No one has to look for evidence; the stink slaps itself on everything.
Friday, September 24, 2010
Drama in Dublin Bay

Wednesday, September 22, 2010
Double Standards extend to Demonic Possession

If we examine the small number of films involving male characters in the throes of demonic possession, there’s a clear difference. The double standards applied to gender fail to fade even when it’s a question of a spectre from hell taking up corporeal residence. Whether it’s Damien the Omen, Rosemary’s Baby, the dude in Amityville Horror or the rest; when male characters are agents of el Diablo, they invariably are invulnerable forces of destruction. We don’t see their bodies getting pummelled unless it’s that doll Chucky. Rosemary, for example puts down the cleaver to coo over her demon child instead of hacking him up. Boys are always prized and valuable, no matter their paternity with satan. In the unwatchable Ghostrider, Nic Cage plays Johnny Blaze who trades his soul to satan for superhero status for shit’s sake. Ash in the Evil Dead series loses only a hand to the evil spirits with the rest of his faculties and resources in check while the women turn into demonic hags.
When girls and women become possessed it’s used as an opportunity for audiences to see them beaten or overtly sexualised in an exercise to satiate culture’s deeply ingrained misogyny. I must have written at least half a dozen times here about the trend for seeing women’s bodies terrorised either in outright pornography or else in the horror genre. As if it wasn’t stomach churning enough to see Hit Girl shot and beaten by middle aged men, there’s an eye-bulging scene in Case 39 where parents stuff a little girl in an oven, secure it with duct tape and then turn on the flames. The modern Grimm’s fairy tale won’t let us exempt girls from brutalised treatment onscreen.
Sometimes the misogyny extends beyond the basic belief that the female is the more deadly of the species and draws some extra-special twisted messages about women’s subhuman status. Take for instance Case 39, a cautionary tale about the misgivings of liberal do-goodism. Renee Zellweger plays a naive social worker with a messianic complex who gets her comeuppance by saving a girl who is not a victim of abuse but possessed by an evil spirit. The film tells us it’s better to not get involved because lordy, the child may turn out to be a bloodthirsty demon.
The only reason to watch Case 39 is to see the demon spawn call Bradley Cooper’s character facile and smug. Talk about nailing character traits on an off screen. Also, the Chinese hold a proverb which measures a person’s intellect by how high one grasps a pair of chopsticks. Zellweger has her fingers wrapped at the bottom near the tips. Enough said of this rancid little film.
Five Strikes and You're Out
Tuesday, September 21, 2010
I Would Cut a Bitch for These

Since high heels cripple my lower back I'm not a big shoe gal and will easily snub the 'it' model of the season. Only holy crap do the Balenciaga colour block platforms for a/w '10 have me in a swoon. They are more Modernist art than footwear.This Burberry navy zip coat also has me similar covet-mode.
You could wear this until threadbare without stepping out of style.
The prices are hideous.
*sigh*
Friday, September 17, 2010
I'm a Sucker for a Cute Face
Thursday, September 16, 2010
The After Life Better Offer More than Pasta
One of the long-running jokes in ‘Defending Your Life’ (1991) is that when you're dead, you can eat as much as you want without worrying about weight gain, a concept which Meryl Streep’s character takes to with abandon. In the scene above, she’s thrilled to be served 3 lbs. of pasta in a cream sauce with broccoli smothered in cheese on the side. She wants to eat her way through the great beyond. Dudes such as Albert Brooks hold dear this hoary chestnut that the only thing that stops women from putting fork to mouth is the fear of ballooning against the beauty norm. Honestly, I’m the opposite; my dream of an ideal existence post-mortal coil would be to never have to eat again, what with the hassle of shopping for comestibles, then all the preparation, mastication, clean up and digestion in a never ending cycle. To be rid of such a charge would be paradise. The husband, now on his own in Toronto, had an epiphany that he eats too much in our last Skype session. Not because his caloric intake is excessive, but in the recognition that keeping a body going entails too much hassle.
So Meryl, fabulous as you are in this and every role, I’ve got to say not every woman considers the bottomless plate of pasta as nirvana.
Misogyny Lasts from Cradle to Grave

Noir Gone Wrong

Folks lazily assume that genre productions are easy to assemble based upon a set pattern of elements in plot and character. It’s not like you can conjure up one third femme fatale to equal parts gumshoe and a frame and end up with a brilliant film (or book for that matter). For all the hundreds of films released in the noir heyday (1944-1955) many of them are tedious exercises in stereotyped static characters and hole-laden plots. No less is true of the neo noir cycle. For every ‘Last Seduction’ there are reams of celluloid as stinky as Belacqua Shuah’s preferred luncheon cheese, just as with ‘Kiss of Death,’ the supposed star vehicle for an insufferable David Caruso. After Cage channelled Dennis Hopper in ‘Blue Velvet’ for his inhaler affectation, the list of predictable lemons followed, such as ‘City of Angels’ (an embarrassing remake of ‘Wings of Desire’); a creepy ‘8mm’ look at snuff films; the mindless ‘Gone in 60 Seconds’; what the heck was up with ‘Snake Eyes,’ ‘Ghost Rider,’ or that trilogy of ‘National Treasure’ films? If it could get any worse, he’s slated for the lead in a film adaptation of ‘The Courtship of Eddie’s Father,’ a forty year-old American television series which displayed some really ignorant racist ideas about how demure and servile Asian women are. All I’m saying is avoid the noir Kiss of Death path, you actor types.
Tuesday, September 14, 2010
Great Wardrobe for a Bad Actor

Friday, September 10, 2010
I Bought a Hipster Bag?

Wednesday, September 08, 2010
Sarah Silverman Wins me Over

Even though I’m not a fan of Sarah Silverman’s ‘dickface’ repertoire which boils down to acting like a 14 year-old boy in hoodie drag, I did relish her truncated life story. Silverman says she's never been raped or abused, except she goes on to tell about a group of boys who caught her alone in the cafeteria and force-fed her cold cuts because she was a vegetarian. It was a horrifying gender-based assault at any rate. The sole regrettable chapter revolves around her mewling defence over making a joke on Conan’s show that used the word ‘chink.’ You can’t cover your ass by declaring your audience too sensitive, clueless or humourless. Own that shit and move on. I think she wants the liberty to say stuff for shock value without being responsible for it other than laying claim to satire. The rest of the memoir is funny, relatable and succeeds in creating a favourable view of someone whose work I tend to avoid. That’s no mean feat, to turn someone around from indifference to the cash register for a sale. Well done, Silverman.
Tuesday, September 07, 2010
Chelsea Handler: Lap Cat of Patriarchy
A lap cat’s arsenal ranges from gossip and talking trash, taking pleasure from cruelty towards women, slut-shaming, sabotage by croissant, and the ever popular ‘body snarking’ as they phrase it over at Jezebel. Women who brow-beat other women generally seem to play the ‘I’m one of the guys ’card more often than not. The motive is a mix of the desire for male approval and the longing for release from an inferior position, in a bid for exceptional stature otherwise known as being one of the ‘good ones.’ There are palpable rewards for women who act as lap cats of patriarchy and do the business of reminding women of their loathsome status.
Take Chelsea Handler, the American best-selling author and late night show host with a considerable audience. Handler’s the new version of Samantha Jones telling women that they can have a better life if they can mimic traditionally male behaviour such as hard drinking and promiscuity. The new Rollingstone cover celebrates her 'slutty' persona. The problem is that Handler wants it both ways. She wants to be able to trade on a slutty persona in her books or on the programme, but instead of reclaiming the pejorative in a contest to culture’s arbitrary estimations of women’s sexuality, she routinely lays the charge of slattern against other women. Just recently she referred women on a reality show as ‘tasteless sluts.’ So it’s bad to be a slut unless you’re Chelsea Handler? She makes a sex tape, poses for Playboy and boasts about her conquests but chastises other women for doing the same thing. Talk about duplicity.
I’ve taken more than one attempt to watch ‘Chelsea Lately,’ especially when a guest from ‘True Blood’ was scheduled. At least half a dozen times I could not watch more than a few minutes, appalled by the glee with which she skewers women, stages cat fights and portrays women as irrational beasts. There’s no limit to the mars and venus mythology and stereotypes in the attacks she wages against women. Handler can’t muster any substantive comedy about women, as say Sandra Bernhard, Jeanine Garofalo or Kathy Griffin create. Chelsea Handler’s affectless shark-eyed delivery, which other critics mistakenly label deadpan, relies heavily on attacking women just for being women. There’s also the way she uses ‘chocolate’ to refer to African Americans and ‘nugget’ as a description of little people as evidence of a raging mean streak.
Nancy Franklin’s recent profile of the comedian in The New Yorker criticised Handler’s act as too self-centred. The real problem is that she’s too self-delusional. Just like her predecessor Joan Rivers, a certain type of comedian are convinced if they savage other women on stage, they’ll be exempt from the culture’s antipathy for women. Each time a woman tears down another in public it’s frequently for male benefit. I’ve done it. We’ve all done it. We need to stop. The easy thing to do is talk trash about women. The truly subversive, daring tactic is not to participate in the ritual gender humiliation.
Chelsea Handler’s not funny. Hating on women may bring her a paycheck and fame, but the presence of a navigable moral compass becomes less certain. Handler’s brand of comedy is Mean Girls on television.



